human brd9 (Bethyl)
Structured Review

Human Brd9, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 55 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human brd9/product/Bethyl
Average 94 stars, based on 55 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Chromatin remodeler BRD9 represses transcription of PPARα target genes, including CPT1A to suppress lipid metabolism"
Article Title: Chromatin remodeler BRD9 represses transcription of PPARα target genes, including CPT1A to suppress lipid metabolism
Journal: Journal of Lipid Research
doi: 10.1016/j.jlr.2025.100874
Figure Legend Snippet: Inhibition of BRD9 enhances the induction of PPARα-downstream gene CPT1A by WY-14643. A: Schematic image of mammalian cBAF, PBAF, and ncBAF . B: Glycerol gradient density sedimentation of the nuclear extract of HepG2 cells. Subunits of each SWI/SNF complex and PPARα protein were detected by Western blot analysis (C–G) HepG2, PHH, PMH, or HepaSH cells were pre-treated with 20 μM BI-9564. After 12 h, the cells were co-treated with 10 μM WY-14643 and 20 μM BI-9564 for 48 h. Human (C and E) and mouse (F) CPT1A mRNA levels were determined using real-time RT-PCR. (D) CPT1A, PPARα, and GAPDH protein levels in HepG2 cells were determined by Western blotting. Each column represents the mean ± SD (n = 4). Western blot experiments were conducted with three independent replicates. In panel (C), data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by the Games-Howell test. In panel (F), data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test. Data in all other panels were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ P < 0.001, compared with NT. † P < 0.05, †† P < 0.01 and ††† P < 0.001, compared with BI-9564 (−). NT: non-treatment.
Techniques Used: Inhibition, Sedimentation, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: Effects of BRD7 and BRD9 knockdown on CPT1A expression in WY-14643-treated HepG2 cells. A–C: HepG2 cells were transfected with siRNA against BRD7 (siBRD7) or BRD9 (siBRD9). After 24 h, the cells were treated with 30 μM WY-14643 for 48 h. A: BRD7, BRD9, PPARα, and GAPDH protein levels were determined using Western blot analysis. B and C: CPT1A mRNA and protein levels were determined using real-time RT-PCR and Western blotting analysis, respectively. Each column represents the mean ± SD (n = 4). Western blot experiments were conducted with three independent replicates. Data in all panels were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. ∗∗ P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ P < 0.001, compared with NT, † P < 0.05 and ††† P < 0.001, compared with siControl. NT: non-treatment.
Techniques Used: Knockdown, Expressing, Transfection, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: BRD9 directly interacts with PPARα. A: Co-immunoprecipitation assay to examine the interaction between PPARα and BRD9 was performed. HEK293T cells were transfected with FLAG-PPARα plasmid together with the BRD7-His or BRD9-His plasmids using Lipofectamine 3000. Cell lysates were subjected to co-immunoprecipitation with His-tag antibody. B: Direct interaction between PPARα and BRD9. HEK293T cells were individually transfected with FLAG-PPARα, BRD7-His, or BRD9-His plasmids. Affinity purification was conducted using cell lysates, and the purified FLAG-PPAR protein was incubated with purified BRD7/9-His proteins. C: Western blotting to analyze lysine acetylation of PPARα. Lysate of FLAG-PPARα plasmid-transfected HEK293T cells was subjected to Western blotting using anti-acetylated lysine and anti-FLAG antibodies. A smaller amount of protein (10 μg) was loaded compared to A (30 μg). Western blot experiments were conducted with three independent replicates.
Techniques Used: Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Immunoprecipitation, Affinity Purification, Purification, Incubation, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Effects of WY-14643 and/or BI-9564 treatment on the binding of PPARα and BRD9 and on the chromatin accessibility around the CPT1A intronic peroxisomal proliferator response element (PPRE). A: Scheme of the CPT1A gene. B: Binding of PPARα to CPT1A intronic PPRE. HepG2 cells were pre-treated with 20 μM BI-9564. After 12 h, the cells were co-treated with 10 μM WY-14643 and 20 μM BI-9564 for 48 h. A ChIP assay using an anti-PPARα antibody was performed, and the purified DNA was analyzed by real-time PCR targeting CPT1A intronic PPRE. C: The interaction between PPARα and BRD9. HEK293T cells were transfected with FLAG-PPARα and BRD9-His plasmids using Lipofectamine 3000, and treated with 30 μM WY-14643 and/or 40 μM BI-9564 for 48 h. The cell lysates were co-immunoprecipitated with anti-His-tag antibody. FLAG-PPARα and BRD9-His were detected by Western blotting. D: Chromatin accessibility around CPT1A intronic PPRE. HepG2 cells were pre-treated with 20 μM BI-9564. After 12 h, the cells were co-treated with 10 μM WY-14643 and 20 μM BI-9564 for 48 h; a FAIRE assay was then performed on the cells. Purified DNA was analyzed by real-time PCR targeting the CPT1A intronic PPRE. Each column represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Data in all panels were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. ∗∗∗ P < 0.001, compared with NT; † P < 0.05 and ††† P < 0.001, compared with BI-9564 (−). NT: non-treatment.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Purification, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot

